Unless you both saw the show she curated at MOMA, curating works from the collection, AND are interested in totally uninteresting art marginalia, I highly suggest use your time elsewhere, or simply relisten to her old moma talk which sustained a pleasant hum that this talk kept dropping with repeated apologies. You can find the old one here or through itunes.
If you are desperately interested maybe just read the synopis:
http://galleristny.com/2013/03/voice-over-trisha-donnelly-on-her-artists-choice-show-at-moma/
or listen to Jerry Saltz be as patronizing and asinine as always:
http://nymag.com/arts/art/reviews/saltz-trisha-donnelly-2012-12/
there is really is a hundred things we could list more interesting than watching this talk.
why not look at images of Eliot Porter's Birds included in the show?
http://bit.ly/ZKNNMv
listen to Scarlatti:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4x86sE8ygg
Listen to Wendy Carlos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yn0HAWX1TSA
Watch John Whitney's 1975 Arabesque also in poor quality:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7h0ppnUQhE
Update, audio recorded from audio tour into phone is here. (1/3)
(very special thanks to both our reporters in the field.)
This video will barely inform you as to what is happening, the images put up on screen register in the video only as gestures towards images rather than actual depictions. If you have not seen the show, and even if you have, you will not have any idea what is being spoken about at certain points.
The sound is heavily processed to reduce ambient noise, voices thus sound strange.
The video does not begin until 19minutes after the audio. The video registers more seats and heads than artist or image.
This is totally for some historical catalog rather than anyone's enjoyment.
